HALCON 10TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION

I WENT TO THE HALCON 10TH ANNIVERSARY FESTIVAL IN YOKOHAMA ON THE 30TH. QUITE A FEW PEOPLE ATTENDED, AND I WAS HONESTLY SURPRISED TO SEE SO MANY PEOPLE INVOLVED IN HALCON.

The content may have been very interesting, depending on the viewer.

But, in my opinion, it is not "good enough".

• Lack of novelty from a technical point of view.
• The point is that there was a lot of talk about "measurement" image processing, which I am not a big fan of. I understand that there are areas where measurement is necessary, but my theory is that "measurement is not necessary for visual inspection".
• Although there may have been a relationship, the fact that they were proudly recommending "that" lighting that we, in our judgment, "should not be used".
• The user case studies didn't seem sharp enough either. I understand that there are limitations in that place.

HOWEVER, EVEN IN THE USER CASE STUDIES, THERE WAS SOMETHING TO SEE IN THE PRESENTATIONS BY COMPANY N, WHICH WENT INTO THE "PEOPLE WHO USE" AND COMPANY C, WHICH DIVULGED PRACTICAL KNOW-HOW.

MVTec also talked about future technological trends, and in my opinion, the trends in image processing for the next 10 years are,

• How to make it easy to use? In order to alleviate future labor shortages due to the aging of the workforce, it is essential to make it something that can be used in the field.
• Increase the quality of the inspection itself. It should be realized that if all defects are not found (as visual inspection equipment), there will be no return on investment.
• Comparative inspection methods (and similar methods) will be an essential feature for visual inspection.

I THOUGHT IT MIGHT BE. AFTER ALL, IT MAY BE FI....

#By the way, the average number of daily visitors to this blog is about 200~250.
#Whether you consider this a lot or a little?
#I just feel that the "buds" are definitely starting to sprout.