The "try it out."

Currently, a considerable number of users have purchased the machine as an experimental machine and are trying various themes.
In contrast to the past projects where "first there is the theme" and "compatibility with image inspection" was ignored, "first there is the experiment" and "those that fit well" are now being introduced.
One of the reasons for this trend is the creation of a "testable" environment.
(1) The system is provided as a finished product, and its "operability," "detection capability," and "compatibility with the object" can be evaluated in advance.
(2) The hardware is highly flexible, and experiments can be conducted even in an environment with a notebook PC, an inexpensive camera, and fluorescent lights.
(3) The inspection logic is simple, and it is easy to understand what is being done.
(4) The countermeasure is clear: if it cannot be detected, "just make it visible" because "undetectable = not visible in the image. It can be summarized almost entirely as a lighting problem.
(5) "Testing" work can be done in a short time, and "interesting" results can be obtained.
(6) It can be said that in the general manufacturing industry, it is unlikely to be "completely useless" for anything. 7) We can say that "tried and tested" equipment will not go to waste.
Whether or not you have tried FlexInspector definitely makes a big difference.