Who does imaging inspection make happy?

Who is happy with the current imaging inspections?

Are we really operating in a situation where we are questioning whether this is the right way to go?

Is it the head of the site who believes that the introduction of inspection equipment will ensure perfect quality and increase efficiency?

Is it the consumer who buys a product believing that it has been well tested?

Are you a field representative of an imaging equipment manufacturer struggling with the conflict between supervisor and user?

Is it the head of an imaging equipment manufacturer who is struggling to make money because he has not been able to raise inspection fees?

Camera, lighting, and board manufacturers, who have to compete for a limited piece of the pie because the market is not expanding.

When I think about it, I don't think anyone is happy. I think it is especially difficult at the user's site and at the manufacturer's site.

How can we break this negative cycle?
The user site evaluates the actual product of the image inspection system against the actual product being manufactured, and if it is good, they buy it; if it is bad, they do not buy it. The manufacturer should provide the actual products that can be evaluated and support the user's site so that they can evaluate them.
This is the only way.

Why don't we quit buying and selling "dreams"?