Specificity of visual inspection

We often talk about this, especially when we talk to equipment manufacturers,
"The quality of automated visual inspection is determined by the user's subjective judgment.
I believe that the goodness or badness of automated visual inspection is determined by the user's subjective judgment.
Neither we, image manufacturers nor equipment manufacturers, can judge whether it is good or bad.
In other words, there is no way to guarantee the operation.
Even on the user side, production engineering, manufacturing, and quality control often have different views.
In other words, there is no way to guarantee that the product will work.
In such a situation, what we can do is to let the users evaluate the actual products themselves,
whether it is suitable for their own ideas, whether it has sufficient detection capability, and whether they can master it.
Is the detection capability sufficient?
The only thing that manufacturers can do is to provide users with materials for judgment.
The general approach of making image processing equipment or inspection equipment according to the user's specifications is to evaluate the product only after it has been completed.
This approach is very risky in that it is impossible to evaluate a product until it is completed.