DEFEAT K COMPANY

WHEN I TALK TO PEOPLE IN THE MACHINE VISION INDUSTRY, I OFTEN HEAR, "BEAT COMPANY K.

It is true that K Corp entered the market about 20 years ago and seems to have taken it all in stride.
But I have a different view,

Achievements that bring the price point closer to the end-user's desired price point.

Achievements that have greatly expanded the market for this product

The business model is to present the actual product, have the customer evaluate the product, and then sell the product.

Continuously evolving through feedback from failures

Frankly, I think it's great. That was the ideal.

In fact, when I touch it, I think, "It's well done.
If anything, say, "I'll make it to the user's specifications,
I would like to say "No!" to the image shops that offer "expensive" image sensor "imitations" by saying "We make them to the user's specifications. I would like to say "No!
However... to Company K

I know you want to sell, but misleading the end user in a confusing way is not a good idea.

Do you need that many pixels in the camera?

Is that lighting really universal?

I'm like, "No!" I think...
And by the way,
I also think it's not right to unilaterally "terminate" a database site I of a group company without a clear explanation of the reason,
I also wonder about the unilateral notice of "termination of listing" without a clear explanation of the reason.
#After all, searchhas shut down many of our competitors.
I expect a side-wrestling match.