Could we have a "study group?"

Computers have evolved at a tremendous rate.
As you all know, computer graphics has become a very common thing.
You may think that visual inspection using image processing has also evolved...
Has the "workplace" changed from 10 years ago?
Has the "field" changed over the past 20 years?
Fundamental ideas and techniques have not changed much from 20 years ago.
It has just become absurdly fast. The cost has also become cheaper.
Cameras are now connected digitally.
Nothing has changed in the results obtained.
Every "field" has exactly the same problems.
It is time to realize that we are doing it wrong.
Is it enough to define defects, detect defects, and sort defects?
Can the company's own production engineering department alone provide an answer to a problem that everyone else has been unable to provide for more than 20 years?
Even if there are "secrets outside the company" in the manufacturing process and the products themselves, there may be no big secrets in the automatic visual inspection technology.
Can't we exchange information beyond the boundaries of the company and work on the common issue of "automatic visual inspection"?
I have been working with users at various sites to define and implement methods to sort out good products.
We are constantly evolving by applying the experience gained there to the next theme.
I imagine that I am acting as a hub, connecting various workplaces.
I wonder if it would be possible to take it one step further and have a "study group" of people working on automatic visual inspections. I think that would be interesting.