Where it can be used and where it cannot be used

We currently have over 10 FlexInspector demo units in operation, including those at our dealers. In most cases, we ask for 2 to 3 weeks.

One of the most common reactions we have received recently as a result of our demo unit evaluations is that we have found that some things work and some things don't. This may sound obvious, but I think it has great significance.

The first is that users themselves made the decision to try it out, rather than evaluating it by the vendor.
Until now, many people have purchased image processing equipment "as recommended by the vendor" or "believing that it can be made," and as a result, the equipment often does not operate properly. In this case, I think it is a great progress that they tried to use the finished product and made a judgment by themselves.

Secondly, it was at a level where I could make a judgment after using it.
Even if I borrowed the equipment for evaluation, if the operation is troublesome, I would barely be able to operate it in two or three weeks, and I would not be able to judge whether it is usable or not. Even before that, just preparing an imaging environment for evaluation would be a challenge. In such a situation, it is very significant that we were able to judge "what is usable and what is not usable" by trying various samples.

Third, the decision was made because of the variety of samples that could be tested.
This is because of the versatility of FI. This would not be possible with a dedicated machine.

I myself know what works and what doesn't work with FI. Before that, I also know that there are things that work well and things that don't work well in image processing inspections.
That is why we want you to evaluate our demo equipment and use it only where it works. And we consider it our job to support you to make it work and to reduce the number of things that don't work.